Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alexandru's avatar

Isn't the argument against public TV a little classist? Sure, you and I will never watch "an entire universe of bad or mediocre German TV", but your delivery person, your supermarket cashier or your nurse probably do - not to mention a lot of grandparents!

Same goes for "schmalzy garbage" - most people in the UK don't miss Love Island. It may seem a bit more complicated with "retrograde shows", but it doesn't have to be - reform the editorial teams so the content isn't racist / homophobic / sexist etc. There's a better chance to make the audience of this show question their antiquated values by speaking their language. They are paying for low-brow entertainment, and they should receive it.

Finally, I also wonder if focusing instead on documentaries is the right way to go. What's the point to produce amazing media that nobody will watch? Same goes for "quality films" - who decides what is quality and what not? Does John Waters qualify? What about John Carpenter?

Evolution, not dissolution. Funding independent media (like this newsletter, which is great) is a first step towards diversification - but it shouldn't be at the expense of things that people already enjoy.

Expand full comment
Joanna's avatar

I really disagree with those saying we shouldn't have to pay for public broadcasting. This is a democracy we've chosen to join, part of what makes it great is its support of culture. We should respect its prior choices even if some of us do also choose to support those lobbying for change.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts